OKRs: Redefine Success for a New Era

Insights

  • OKRs have reformed the way firms define their priorities, make money, and drive customer impact.
  • Objectives (O) are a firm’s key strategic vision and team-level rationale for the efforts spent. Key results (KRs) are metrics and initiatives to make a firm’s vision and roadmap impactful.
  • OKRs bridge the gap between strategy and execution to transform enterprises from output-based to Agile outcome-focused.
  • Firms struggle to institutionalize OKRs for many reasons. One of the major hurdles is transparency of information, a necessary conduit to bring all levels of the organization onboard.
  • OKRs should be set at the executive level and cascaded down quickly and thoughtfully. At the same time, OKRs should be built with bottom-up intelligence (i.e., involving frontline employees). Employees then become value drivers in the firm’s goal setting.
  • A good dose of on-the-ground OKR work leads to more communication and strategic alignment. It also aids regular monitoring and periodic revision of a firm’s business case and roadmap.
  • Firms across industries must invest boldly, ground themselves in engineering excellence, remain faithful to long-term shareholders, and embrace OKRs in their business development and operations.

OKRs help firms stay focused while innovating, all in a bid to remain flexible, strategically positioned, and evolve with customer demands. Organizations such as Google, Intel, LinkedIn, and Infosys use OKRs for better customer engagement, digital services, and higher profits.

Investor legend John Doerr first introduced OKRs to Google in late 1999. Since then, OKRs have reformed the way firms define their priorities, make money, and drive customer impact.1

Objectives (O) are a firm’s key strategic vision and team-level rationale for the efforts spent. They lead each employee toward customer and client success and encourage teams through individual actions, emotions, and behavior to accomplish common yet important goals. Objectives (O) ensure timely completion of goals and significant business value.

Key results (KRs) are metrics and initiatives to make a firm’s vision and roadmap impactful.

OKRs bridge the gap between strategy and execution to transform enterprises from output-based to Agile outcome-focused.

OKRs develop leaders, inspire workers, and unify teams. By measuring what matters, OKRs help the Gates Foundation mobilize against disease and poverty in Africa. They drive Google in its quest to make the world’s information freely accessible to all. They also help Elon Musk and Tesla encourage employee engagement around measurable stretch goals.

In his vision to bring the ONE Campaign to Dalori (Nigeria), Bono, the lead singer of the rock band U2 and a prominent human rights activist, said, “ONE isn’t standing on our passion. We’re not standing on moral outrage. We’re standing on a foundation built on certain principles, and with walls and floors — with a certain structure of thinking from the OKRs. It takes intellectual rigor to effect change; it requires very serious strategies, indeed.”2

OKRs are not KPIs

OKRs break the status quo and ensure the firm is future-focused and directional. They are aggressive, bold statements of intent with a fixed duration. For example, one OKR could be to increase gross profit margin by 30% for the first quarter. Conversely, key performance indicators (KPIs) improve an ongoing process or activity and monitor the steady state of a business. They are a result or a leading indicator. Rather than stretching the firm to achieve more, they provide definite benchmarks for decision making. In all, OKRs are set for a fixed duration and revised or crafted after that, while KPIs are measured continually.

OKRs are aggressive, bold statements of intent that ensure the firm is future-focused and directional

Figure 1. Characteristics of OKRs

Figure 1. Characteristics of OKRs

Source: Infosys Knowledge Institute

OKRs in high-tech and manufacturing

OKRs are useful for all industries. The high-tech and manufacturing industry should aggressively implement OKRs for the maximum business impact (see Figure 2). The industry is at the forefront of Agile transformation, including the use of cross-functional, collaborative, and autonomous teams, as discussed in our Agile Radar research.

Figure 2. Example OKR setting for high-tech and manufacturing

Figure 2. Example OKR setting for high-tech and manufacturing

Getting data is becoming relatively easier. The harder part is pulling it together and leveraging it to get meaningful, actionable insights. Organizations that get this right by putting the right data in the hands of the right people will build better, more informed customer experiences that will bring consumers back to them.

Challenges on the ground

Firms struggle to institutionalize OKRs for many reasons. CEOs must be on board so that the urgency is translated down through the business hierarchy. The transparency of information, a necessary conduit to bring all levels of the organization onboard, is difficult too. And then, sales, marketing, and operations teams don’t share their knowledge easily. Also, senior management approvals for initiatives take so much time and don’t immediately reflect under account statements.

Unless the executive vision is clear, transparent, and actionable, stringent objective-setting can be counterproductive. Poorly defined objectives lead to employee burnout and induce a demoralized company culture. Done badly, OKRs give employees little say in the end products or services produced.

OKRs should be built with bottom-up intelligence (i.e., involving frontline employees), with light steering from the executive suite. Employees then become value drivers in the firm’s goal setting.

This works well for the business too. Employees closest to the work have in-depth knowledge about how best to achieve business outcomes. They understand all possible alternatives to the product or service being built.

As Kurt Bittner writes in Scrum.org, “when organizations free their people to contribute using all of their knowledge, experience, and passion, they achieve better results.”3

From activities to outcomes

OKRs can be dangerous in unequipped hands. But done right, they improve focus and deliver better business outcomes. Scrum.org has developed its own OKR improvement framework Evidence-Based Management. In this framework, OKRs are expressed in terms of outcomes rather than activities and outputs.4

From activities to outcomes

Objectives as activities reduce business innovation and process improvement, and as outputs lead to employee micromanagement. But objectives as outcomes institutionalize the real goal of achieving activities and outputs, giving the firm a true North Star to work toward.

In many ways, objectives, key results, and activities (or Agile product backlog items) form a hierarchy (see Figure 3). Once devised, OKRs are graded after the allotted time has passed, with organizations’ preferred scoring system. For instance, Google grades OKRs on a scale of 0 to 1, with a sweet spot at 0.7 to 0.8, showing the firm has met the objective. If the score is too low, the OKR can be rolled over to the next period, and if too high, the firm could revise OKRs. OKRs can also be graded using a red, amber, and green traffic light system.

Figure 3. How OKRs and the Agile product backlog combine in manufacturing

Figure 3. How OKRs and the Agile product backlog combine in manufacturing

Source: Infosys Knowledge Institute

Top-down approach to build OKRs

Business should work with IT to build OKRs into their operating models. The high-level corporate objectives should also have inputs from the middle management for greater transparency and effectiveness. Team Os and associated KRs should have inputs from employees of diverse fields. Most importantly, OKRs should be set at the executive level and cascaded down quickly and thoughtfully. This is difficult because of the changing shape of the original goal while passing through at speed across various departments. Tracking the OKR then becomes imperative, with management commitment achieved early on, and a robust mechanism in place (see Figure 4).

Figure 4. OKR tracking mechanism

Figure 4. OKR tracking mechanism

Source: Infosys Knowledge Institute

Intel overcame the inherent difficulty of OKRs to overtake Motorola as the preeminent manufacturer of chip devices and microprocessors in the late 1980s. The company worked in an agile cadence, with all stakeholders involved in the company vision. But the main sticking point was CEO Andy Grove’s insistence on clear communication, transparency, and senior management involvement in an easy-to-understand OKR-setting. In the words of one chip architect: “We moved fast because OKRs were cascaded quickly both vertically and horizontally. Money was freed up, and excitement pervaded everything the organization touched, from materials used to marketing brochures handed out to at each conference. It was also important that events sales personnel were attendant to sell the microprocessor to hungry clients.”5

Another great feature of Intel’s OKR strategy was that the core tech remained as is; the microchip and the overall product stayed the same, but the marketing strategy made a strong pivot (an effort internally known as “Operation Crush”),6 along with the sales and delivery, operations, and thought leadership.

Strategic budget is vital

SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, also uses Agile. Its employee-level KPIs include burn-down rate, cycle time, and technical proficiency.7 The company now looks toward more holistic, long-term, business-driven objectives and results8 to drive efficiencies and achieve corporate and social success. For this, a strategic budget is necessary.

A launch of Falcon 9, a precursor to Musk’s Starship voyager to Mars, costs a relatively modest $67 million — 24 times cheaper than NASA at $1.6 billion. Musk and his team achieved this by developing reusable rocketry. They also borrowed money cheaply and utilized the Spotify, Meta, and Silicon Valley method of “fail fast and break things”. This is an amazing feat, given the complexity and dangers of space travel.9 As Cliff Berg writes in Medium: “SpaceX has made a sophisticated design work, not by trying to perfect it for years before building anything and getting it just right, but by making their best design and then trying it, pushing it to its limits where it blows up, measuring everything about what happens, and then going back to the drawing board and trying again — and again, and again.”10

Of course, ongoing expenditures are still significant. The number of Falcon 9 launches reached 31 in 2021, with over $2 billion currently being spent by the company per year on lift-off alone. And this doesn’t include the expense of the SpaceX Starlink and Starship endeavors.11 The firm now plans a strategic budget for upcoming actions, much ahead of other fast-growing organizations.12 The Infosys Knowledge Institute’s recent Modernization Radar 2022 research found that using a strategic budget instead of discretionary increases revenue by more than 11% year-on-year.13 A good dose of on-the-ground OKR work leads to more communication and strategic alignment. It also aids regular monitoring and periodic revision of a firm’s business case and roadmap. And that’s how the firm moves from “doing Agile” to “being Agile.”14

The real sticking points

Most organizations can’t just make ad hoc process improvements and achieve success in the 21st century. Unless goals and associated work are written down, organizations often forget where they are headed. Some studies show that unless organizations put learned materials to use, they have negligible impact.15 All shareholders, including customers and clients, must know where the firm is heading, both now and in the future. This extends the way firms treat their employees, use materials, implement artificial intelligence (AI), and consider social issues such as practical sustainability and surveillance tech.16

OKRs, the Infosys way

Infosys uses OKRs productively in many domains. It has built organizational initiatives such as sustainability, environment protection, and employee diversity into the OKR model.

In 2020, Infosys published its ESG vision for 2030 (see Figure 5). Commitments across core areas include technology for good, climate change, revitalized local communities, inclusion, and diversity. They also include information management, cyber posture, ethics, and transparency. This legacy of purpose and impact has inducted Infosys into the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI) and made it a part of the DJSI World and DJSI Emerging Markets Indices.17

Figure 5. Infosys’ Os and associated KRs for 2030

Figure 5. Infosys’ Os and associated KRs for 2030

Toward the live enterprise

Unless firms concentrate on processes, they forget the work performed, the successes gained, and the skilled workers. OKRs transcend day-to-day pain points by focusing organizations on tangible business outcomes. They ignite productivity by ensuring that work performed is rewarded accordingly. They improve business roadmaps, going beyond casual group-think exercises. They also enable teams to seek regular feedback and review and refine programs in real time. This gives business owners more flexibility to de-prioritize certain initiatives on the business roadmap, based on OKR-set new outcomes.18

OKRs transcend day-to-day pain points by focusing organizations on tangible business outcomes

Along with OKRs, organizational sentience through AI systems must become the mantra of the latter part of this decade.19 The ability to use telemetry and feed in real-time data to improve business processes has become crucial. Firms need to invest in AI, build a digital brain and knowledge graph (like Google, Microsoft, and Infosys), and upskill employees to work with this new customer-centric approach.

The ultimatum

Musk should go to Mars. Intel should make microprocessors even faster to drive fundamental shifts in the ways AI, human-centric personalization, augmented reality, and the enterprise metaverse are used. Infosys will continue to grow and become a more potent Live Enterprise.20 Industrial manufacturers should use data intelligently to drive efficiencies and lower costs. Big players such as Amazon, Cisco, and Siemens should become more innovative to understand customers’ desires much ahead of time. OKRs make all this happen through customer-centricity and product-centric value delivery.

OKRs help organizations concentrate on business outcomes. The vision starts from the top, filters down, and inspires both frontline workers and senior leadership. As Gautam Khanna, Infosys’ senior lead for modernization, says: “A roadmap, business case, and overarching vision was a key factor in the Infosys transformation to becoming a digitally native company in just three years.”21

Infosys’ sales growth is now 20% year-on-year, where OKRs play a big part.22 Firms across industries must invest boldly, ground themselves in engineering excellence, remain faithful to long-term shareholders, and embrace OKRs in their business development and operations.

References

  1. When John Doerr brought a ‘gift’ to Google’s founders, John Doerr, 24 April 2018, Wired.
  2. Measure what matters: OKRs: The simple idea that drives 10X growth, John Doerr, 24 April 2018, Penguin.
  3. OKRs: The good, the bad, and the ugly, Kurt Bittner, 24 November. 2020, Scrum.org.
  4. OKRs: The good, the bad, and the ugly.
  5. How Intel won the microprocessor wars, John Doerr, 17 May 2018, Management Today.
  6. How Intel won the microprocessor wars.
  7. What SpaceX can teach us about OKRs, Arnaud Meunier, 2 July 2018, Partech.
  8. Blue Origin vs SpaceX: How these companies set short term and long term goals, James Ayling, 17 June 2021, People Goal.
  9. To cheaply go: How falling launch costs fueled a thriving economy in orbit, Denise Chow, 8 April 2022, CBC News.
  10. SpaceX’s use of Agile methods, Cliff Berg, 9 December. 2019, Medium.
  11. Number of carrier rockets launched by SpaceX from 2006 to 2022, by type, Erick Burgueño Salas, 25 March 2022, Statista.
  12. Modernization Radar 2022, Harry Keir Hughes, April 2022, Infosys Knowledge Institute.
  13. Modernization Radar 2022.
  14. Break down change management into small steps, Rafee Tarafdar and Jeff Kavanaugh, 3 May 2021, Harvard Business Review.
  15. Forgetting curve, Wikipedia.
  16. Practical sustainability: Circular commerce, smarter spaces and happier humans, Jeff Kavanaugh and Corey Glickman, March 2022, Infosys Knowledge Institute.
  17. Infosys turns carbon neutral 30 years ahead of 2050, the timeline set by the Paris agreement, 28 October. 2020, Infosys.
  18. Business Analysts: Agile imposters or value drivers?, Suchitra Kulkarni and Harry Keir Hughes, February. 2022, Infosys Knowledge Institute.
  19. Tech Navigator: Building the human-centric future, Harry Keir Hughes, March 2022, Infosys Knowledge Institute.
  20. Live Enterprise: A continuously learning and evolving organization, Harry Keir Hughes & Rafee Tarafdar & Jeff Kavanaugh, July 2019, Infosys.
  21. Modernization Radar 2022.
  22. Cloud chaos to clarity, Infosys.

Download

Connect with the Infosys Knowledge Institute

All the fields marked with * are required

Opt in for insights from Infosys Knowledge Institute Privacy Statement

Please fill all required fields